★★★★★
After the retention module in Site Ledger Audit Studio, our release checklist finally matched what the bank asked for. I still wish the sample set included more MEP packages, but the method stuck.
Wei Chen — project controller, Taichung
Reviews
What people say after their first ledger walkthrough.
Voices from QS desks, site offices, and owner-side finance—each tied to a specific Connectifynet module or workflow.
“I used the change-order trail exercise the same week on a school renovation. Caught a double-claimed scaffolding line that would have sat unnoticed until final account.”
Hana, Kaohsiung
★★★★☆
Solid on evidence linking inside the financial auditing app workflow. The forum can be quiet mid-week. Not a flaw in the teaching—just plan for async replies.
Anonymous client in civil works
Platform-style note: enrolled via Portfolio Audit for three estimators. Average completion 38 days. Internal NPS after memo review: 8.2.
Learning lead · mid-size GC
Case note: 14-month residential tower
An owner-side analyst took Project Ledger mid-way through a tower fit-out. Before Connectifynet, monthly claim packs arrived as email attachments with inconsistent filenames. After Module 3, the team required photo IDs on every variation above a set threshold and logged them in the audit app before finance signed.
Result over two claim cycles: three variations returned for missing site proof; one subcontractor invoice rejected for period mismatch. The analyst noted the course does not replace legal advice on contract clauses—it sharpened the operational filter that feeds counsel.
Case note: Municipal road resurfacing
A junior QS completed Field Review, then joined Site Ledger Audit Studio. Their mentor reported cleaner progressive billing commentaries—less narrative fluff, more cost-code references. Mild reservation: night-shift paving photos were hard to match to the practice dataset’s daylight examples, so the pair built a local photo naming rule on top of the course method.